The nuclear power industry placed a sizable ad in The New York Times today that looks exactly like a news story. Or maybe it is a news story, I can’t tell. Reporter Diane Cardwell states that in spite of “lingering issues” such as waste disposal and safety, policy makers and analysts and executives “along with a growing number of environmentalists” are supporting nuclear power as a source of clean energy. She quotes amply from the first three categories–the usual Energy Department, Exelon, and academic-cum-industry voices–but skips the environmentalists. Unless that would be Michael Shellenberger, president of a nonprofit that calls itself Environmental Progress, whose website plainly declares that its purpose is to defend nuclear power. What planet did Cardwell come from? “I don’t look at documents,” she has boasted, relying instead on listening to the tone of sources’ voices and the content of their explanations, according to a profile from the NYU journalism program. Diane, Diane, please, read some documents. If you’re going to continue on this beat, try the nearest library–try NYU!–which will be chockablock with Times-safe references about those darn lingering issues.
But after the release of Kamagra medicine and mainly recommended by doctors worldwide, because of its sildenafil soft tabs selfless reason of sending the right signals to the brain that sexy time is over. It also find out content buy cheap viagra increases the size of the male organ for better results. It is because the internet based suppliers offer different viagra without prescription exclusive purchase benefits. It is one of the best herbal pills to cure erectile dysfunction. india sildenafil