“There appears to be no threshold below which exposure [to ionizing radiation] can be viewed as harmless.” This statement by Herbert Abrams, renowned radiologist and longtime professor at Harvard and Stanford who died last week, can be fairly characterized as fundamental bedrock beneath principled arguments against nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and the full panoply of nuclear applications. Enshrined in the National Academy of Sciences’ BEIR VII report on the health effects of low-level radiation, which he helped compose as one of two physicians among 16 international experts on epidemiology, radiation biology, genetics, cancer biology, radiology and physics, the so-called linear-no-threshold model remains an enormous thorn in the side of military, industrial, and academic proponents of nuclearOnly a few among them come out with a knife or a viagra canada sales scalpel. People feel shame to disclose this problem viagra cipla india http://opacc.cv/documentos/Boletim%20de%20Inscricao%20de%20Participante%20-%20agosto%202012.pdf in front of the doctor’s office or the local drug-store are gone in the past. For this you need that registered plastic viagra sildenafil 100mg paper in your hands. It is very important to opacc.cv buy pill viagra consult doctor before you start using this medication. technology. Many members of his own medical specialty, for whom x-rays are nearly sacred and thus dangerously over-used, have had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the scientific consensus expressed by BEIR VII. The substance of the report is routinely contradicted or simply ignored whenever the mainstream press covers stories about nuclear power, as I have often pointed out. A long life of battling cogently against this kind of know-nothingness was perhaps foreshadowed 75 years ago at Cornell, when as a senior he won the Class of 1894 Memorial Prize in Debating on the question “How far can democracy be tolerant and survive?” His voice on that and many other subjects will be missed.
