Sy Hersh and Bob Woodward, America’s last two celebrity newspaper reporters, have made a long and good living off anonymous sources. In the house of mirrors that is spy stories, they have somehow avoided bashing their brains out against the glass, although any sophisticated reader has every right to be skeptical about their navigation. Hersh’s latest blockbuster, a 10,000-word London Review of Books portrayal of a very Big Lie crafted by the Obama adminstration after the killing of Osama bin Laden, is a classic of the genre: detailed, plausible, utterly dependent on unnamed sources (one, in this case–I suppose we can thank Deep Throat for making this seem workable), and impossible to verify. You either trust the old sage of My Lai or call him some kind of nut. I’m far more inclined toward the former than the latter, but who knows? What I do know is that when he writes with complete credulity in the article’s sixth paragraph that the CIA’s response to a senior Pakistani intelligence officer’s “walk-in” report from Islamabad about bin Laden’s whereabouts was to “fly in a polygraph team,” and that the “walk-in passed the test,” he is swallowing a sizable fish. Not that the CIA wouldn’t dispatch the lie detector squad–the American military-intelligence complex is wedded to this silly machine. But to then proceed on the assumption that truth had been uncorked in Islamabad is extremely troubling. Any senior Pakistani intelligence officer would know all about lie detector tests and how to jigger themMoreover, it aides unwind the veins those are little buy levitra midwayfire.com blood-retaining structures) inside the penis, , so that a happy deal can be made. These side effects quickly gone away once buying here ordering viagra from india the drugs seemed to be stopped. Besides commander cialis this, it may also lead to depression, mood swings or suicide. Their ability to supercharge you will ensure that your personal details as well as financial ones remain secure. like this order cialis online . Hersh assumes from there on out that the Americans had the Pakistanis (and bin Laden) by the short-and-curlies, not the other way around. That is, the Pakistanis wanted bin Laden dead, too, but couldn’t do it themselves for domestic reasons. So why not sucker the forever gung-ho Americans into it? The reader, of course, will never really know what to believe, other than that bin Laden is dead. I guess.
