Exeunt

Spring semester’s end marks my retirement from teaching after 20 years at Johns Hopkins. Now the old unsolved mystery: Where does the time go? I will miss the students, some more than others. (The faculty are already remembered like odd ducks from childhood. It is highly possible that I have become one, too.) They brought fresh initiative to my dwindling personal cache. If we can give them a fair chance, maybe we’re going to be okay. Everything else looks iffy, except spring itself.

 

 

 

Project Maven: Cease and Desist

A report that Google is hedging on its pledge to stop participating in Project Maven, the military program to adopt artificial intelligence for drone targeting, brings to mind Hans Bethe’s 1995 plea to scientists and engineers developing new nuclear weapons: “cease and desist.” For the old lion of Los Alamos, there was only one way to end the perpetual technical refinement of weaponry: remove yourselves, all of you, right now.  It was the logical conclusion of a line of thought he had expressed as early as 1954, regarding work on nuclear fusion armaments: “In the course of time, the present conflict between communism and democracy, between East and West, is likely to pass, just as the religious wars of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries have passed. We can only hope that it will pass without thermonuclear war. But whichever way it goes, the H-bomb will remain with us and remain a perpetual danger to mankind.” Pity he is not here today to comment on the relentless development of autonomous lethal drones. Of course, few took his advice back then.

Star Wars Ad Infinitum

After three generations of futile efforts to develop reliable defenses against ICBM’s, tracing back to the Nike, Patriot, and Sprint programs of the 1950’s and 60’s and warped by Ronald Reagan’s science fictional “Star Wars” scheme, the Trump administration will today pick up the eternal torch. The chimera of anti-missile weaponry remains the most inexhaustible strategy for channeling hundreds upon hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. Treasury into the military and its industrial minions—far, far easier than even an endless war. It is now part of the everyday furniture of American life. Future historians will marvel at this mendacious folly.

 

 

Teller Lite: On the Death of Harold Brown

With the passage of another Cold War “whiz kid” whose youthful technological prodigy was sacrificed on the altar of nuclear supremacy, historians are left to contemplate why. Harold Brown’s mentor, Edward Teller, epitomized the clinical paranoia that ruled the era, so much so that Teller became unemployable in the government he relentlessly militarized. By contrast, Brown remained acceptable in polite Washington company, perhaps because he lacked the H-bomb father’s vampirish Hungarian accent. (Too, he had an enjoyable sense of humor, as when he told the Senate Armed Services Committee in April 1987 that Sen. Pete Wilson’s views on certain Star Wars issues “may win a Nobel prize–not in physics, but in perverse literature.”) But Brown’s legacy of world-destroying weapons, including the grotesque MX ICBM, is testament to how thoroughly he nonetheless embodied Teller’s mindset. A seemingly immortal relic of the catastrophe that was World War II is the industrial and political constituency that continues to laud America’s myriad Harold Browns as saviors of democracy.  But they can and will justify anything, especially any raid on the nation’s treasury, in the name of defense against whatever goes bump in the night. Harold Brown, like so many of his fellow whizzes, should be mourned as a mind wasted on an obsession that was and still is a national disaster.

He was, to boot, a longtime director of the tobacco giants Altria and Philip Morris.

Where’s Wernher?

Can you find the Nazi war criminal?

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Apollo 8, 12/21/68

Google v. DARPA: AI on Different Planets

Concerns about harmful applications of artificial intelligence are “very legitimate.” Dangers posed by artificial intelligence are “not one of those things that keeps me up at night.” Guess which words were spoken by Google CEO Sundar Pichai and which by DARPA director Steven Walker. While the tempest-tossed masses may be forgiven for not even knowing what AI is, let alone whether it is good or bad, these two authorities at the top of the technocratic ladder reflect the field’s deepest knowledge base. Right? So Pichai is troubled and Walker is what, me worry? Here in a crystalline nutshell is the battle for the future between civilian and military applications that is one of the strongest story lines in the history of technology, especially for the past century. Hundreds of billions of dollars push the tech from each side. Pichai and Walker ought to start spending occasional weekends together–you know, maybe get to know each other a little, being apparently from different planets.

There Will Always Be a Dr. He

As the international scientific community adjusts its wig after the shockwave of the world’s first genetically altered babies, one thing is clear: self-regulation of research is always a pipe dream. He Jiankui is neither a “rogue scientist” nor “crazy.” He is not a Dr. Moreau. He carries all the credentials of his profession’s elite. History abundantly shows that once a technology as potent as CRISPR exists, nothing can stop it from being used. Someone, somewhere, will feel an irresistible social need, whether from the exigencies of war that compelled the world’s top physicists to use their new knowledge of nuclear fission to make atomic bombs or from the dire straits of AIDS victims in China that compelled genome editors there to make children resistant to infection. The brave new world stumbles on.

On the Death of Ricky Jay, Magician

Long ago and far away, in an old collegetown in the land of prestidigital lakes, lived three damsels in a half-timber cottage. They had faces that could launch thousands of ships and the most handsome, strongest young men of the college gladly would have tried that and whatever else might possibly win even a single hour of their fancy. But there were so many fine suitors that it took nothing short of magic to acquire more than the pleasure of an idle afternoon. So one of the young men, an outlier who appeared to foolish eyes as just another schlub with long hair, learned to pluck ping-pong balls and quarters from behind the pretty ears of the loveliest of the three. She was of course charmed by this impossible feat and made him her consort, no matter that he had a suspicious name and no visible past other than something to do with New Jersey. This was perhaps his first great act of wizardry, from which he went on to acclaim around the wide world.

So rest in peace, Ricky.  Somehow you knew from the start what it takes to enchant the hard-to-get.

M$-DO$: On the Death of Paul Allen

The stratospheric jackpot that poured into the lap of Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen transformed him into the kind of American hero that will take generations of historical consideration to bring back down to earth. Part of the zeitgeist that will have to be conjured is the culture of 1970s engineering that placed a technological revolution at the fingertips of some very young outliers. (This was not the first time, of course–the founders of the aviation industry were pretty odd kids. None of them ever achieved jillionaire status, however, partly because the federal government bought the seminal Wright patent during WWI.) The record of who wrote which lines of code during the first days of “home” computer operating systems is too convoluted to repeat here.  Suffice it to say that the story of MS-DOS, the three-cherries program that released that mountain of dollars, was not a narrative of springing fully formed from the head of Zeus. That Allen and his co-Midas pursued a deal with International Business Machines is another cultural kink, IBM in those days having a corporate personality that channeled General Motors, God, and the Pentagon. The history of American technology and capitalism is a single thread. One fiber without the other will never explain the Paul Allen’s of our era and their mind-boggling fortunes.

B-21: “Raiders of the Lost Mind” Cont’d

The Congressional Research Service, which is supposed to help members of Congress understand the limitless arcana of American government, has issued an update on the B-21 Raider strategic bomber program. Although billions of dollars continue to pour into the project–one of the Air Force’s top 3 procurement priorities–since CRS’s last look, the research agency has nothing much new to say.   Fundamental technical details remain unavailable.  The vast program is still being managed through “nontraditional means” via a purposely miniaturized Air Force office. Special Access classification, long criticized as fostering mismanagement, still makes validating the proposed costs impossible. In other words, it’s still trust us, good fellas as far as Congressional oversight is concerned.